Sit down for this, because I’m about to knock your socks off. Nick Saban–sweet, innocent Nick Saban–said something contraversial the other day. He referred to 9/11 and Pearl Harbor as catastrophes. He also referred to alcoholism as hitting rock bottom. He then said that sometimes it takes hitting the bottom to wake up and realize what you must do. We can all agree with that. But then–and here’s the truly offensive part–he tried to apply that lesson to something that doesn’t involve death. Shameful. Football is just a game for most of us, but it’s his life. You can say it is because he’s obsessed and myopic, or you can recognize that football puts a roof over his family’s head, food on the table, and allows his kids to attend nice schools and for him to provide for his loved ones the same life most of us would choose if we could. Football is a game to us, but it is everything to a football coach, so forgive him if he muddles the degrees a little.
Repeatedly and from different sources I have read that Saban should have used different examples. Fair enough. Had he said that the loss to UL-Monroe was a catastrophe without using imagery then no one would have said anything. Heck, even one of our contributors here referred to the UT-UK game just this past weekend as “life and death.” There’s no outrage of course, because he wasn’t specific. Nor should there be. Hyperbole is the nature of the English language, specifically the American contribution to it. Should Saban have consulted the list of acceptable historical events that may be referenced? Yes. Is he a monster for not doing so? No.
I was honestly willing to move on from this until Boomtown Madman of this blog showed me this article by John Feinstein. This is a complete and utter injustice. I’m almost wary that Feinstein might be such a genius that I’m missing out on this being a parody of what others have been saying. Showing surprise that the university president isn’t threatening to fire Saban for this? Get some freaking perspective, John. This is everything Saban’s comments weren’t: willfully malicious, wreckless, and embracing an arrogance you only find in sportswriters trying to sign their next book deal. Worse than all that however, is that he is guilty of far worse than what Saban did. He’s taking Saban’s words out of context, sensationalizing them, and then using a small incident to a far greater degree so as to exploit the victims of 9/11 and Pearl Harbor for his own benefit. Anyone else notice there hasn’t been an outcry from a single person with any rightful claim to heartache from those tragedies? No swiftboat campaigns. No veterans organizations demanding retraction. None of that. Only hypocrites like Feinstein who are using this as a means to throw another dart at a man they want to hate but can’t find quite a good enough reason to do so. For crying out loud, Don Shula didn’t even comment on this and Saban can’t even take a dump without that man criticizing it’s color and consistency.
Feinstein isn’t reporting on a story, and he isn’t just giving an opinion. He is trying to tell people how to respond to something that any sane person would acknowledge was innocent, regardless of whether they think it was appropriate or not. How else can you explain someone who refers to Nick Saban as “one of the worst people in all of sports” but then lists only one reason why and summarily dismisses that reason himself.
I guess I just don’t understand it. I don’t have a problem with people thinking it’s inappropriate for using these references. Rational minds acknowledge he meant no disrespect or malice. At worst it was a mistake, and a fairly minor one at that.
Far from a mistake, though, Feinstein’s comments–and those of countless other journalists–were pre-meditated and in that respect they should be held accountable. They won’t be, of course, because in this country there is no higher court than the media. But in real life what they are doing is far worse. If what Saban did is plug too many Christmas tree lights into the socket, then Feinstein smelled smoke, bought gasoline, and dumped it all over the house. One started a fire, the other is an arsonist. Oops. Am I getting too close to unacceptable? Can I expect folks from Chicago to rain demands of resignation upon my head now? Of course not. With the current media climate, the only people who will complain will be those who’ve never been to Chicago, but maybe ordered a slice of stuffed pizza at Sbarro because their cousin told them it’s “like Chicago-style.”





.png)
Recent Comments